If it isn't a perfect analogy, the willingness to sell out principles is common to the two.
Apple defers to China to increase its profits.
Hollywood deferred to Hitler to increase profits.
Okay. I can see that to clarify the analogy, I should say "Germany" instead of "Hitler"; also, Apple is a single corporation, whereas Hollywood refers to many of the major film companies of the 1930s. However, all the film companies were forced to act together through the Hays Office by Germany and their consul in Los Angeles, Georg Gyssling:
Gyssling had the option of informing the Hays Office, a private group that represented the major Hollywood studios, that if the [distinctly anti-Nazi] film were made then his government might place a ban on all American movies in Germany. It is uncertain whether Gyssling actually did this – the evidence is inconclusive – but he probably did,